Baddeley (1966a)
Aim: To investigate how information is coded in short-term memory (STM).
Method: Baddeley conducted three experiments investigating coding in STM. This summary focuses on the first experiment. Baddeley used an independent groups design involving 41 participants. 20 participants were allocated to Condition A and 21 to Condition B. Each participant attempted to recall 24 sequences of five words in the correct order.
In Condition A, participants recalled 24 sequences:
12 sequences containing acoustically similar words, such as mad, man, mat, cap and can
12 sequences containing acoustically dissimilar words, such as cow, day, bar, few and pen
In Condition B, participants recalled 24 sequences:
12 sequences containing semantically similar words, such as big, long, broad, great and large
12 sequences containing semantically dissimilar words, such as old, deep, late, safe, and hot
Results: The mean percentages of sequences correctly recalled were:
CONDITION | MEAN |
Acoustically similar | 9.6% |
Acoustically dissimilar | 82.1% |
Semantically similar | 64.7% |
Semantically dissimilar | 71.0% |
Baddeley found that:
recall was substantially worse for acoustically similar words than for acoustically dissimilar words
there was only a small difference in recall between semantically similar and semantically dissimilar words
Conclusion: Baddeley concluded that information in STM is coded acoustically. Acoustically similar words were much more difficult to recall because their similar sounds caused confusion within STM. Semantic similarity had a much smaller effect, suggesting that word meanings were less important when information was recalled immediately.