In a sixth form debating society, Samina is the only student in a group of six who does not believe that drugs should be legalised.

Using your knowledge of minority influence processes, explain two ways in which Samina could convince the other students in the debating society to agree with her. [4 marks]

Answer: Samina could show consistency by maintaining her view that drugs should not be legalised and repeatedly presenting well-reasoned arguments to support her position. By showing that her opinion is stable and unwavering over time, she demonstrates confidence and credibility, which can make others more likely to reconsider their views.

She could also show flexibility by acknowledging that some less harmful drugs might be decriminalised rather than fully legalised. By showing she is open to compromise and considering alternative perspectives, Samina avoids appearing rigid, making her arguments more persuasive to the rest of the group.